Fox News demonstrates both good and bad ways to cover Ebola
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjnaWuflOk-V0sZfPo3WTRBKFezfuDnh8YSR84uuY7TTvGUDdj-iB-djIvymhkyQJnRkgjWMj2tXg9rlRtux7pdI6VCDKMPLUFVO96GummpV3gOQ8DEKuDTwR-10I2ptAjjPs9hLu1Ozj5w/s1600/Screen+shot+2014-10-17+at+10.39.40+AM.png)
Some news outlets, including Fox, have been wildly spreading fears about Ebola. As an example of both good and bad ways that the media covers science, let’s take a look at a recent clip from Fox News in which they interview Dr. David Sanders about the possibility of Ebola virus mutating to become airborne-transmissible (right now it is only spread by direct contact!) Their story is titled " Purdue professor says Ebola 'primed' to go airborne. " Here is a link to the video . I’ll start off with the good things : 1) Dr. Sanders did a good job explaining that Ebola is not airborne right now, but there is a "non-zero" probability that Ebola might mutate to infect the lungs and become air transmissible. And this probability increases as more people are infected. 2) The newscasters did a good job of accurately recapping what he was explaining without blowing it out of proportion. Now for some bad things : 1) Quite obviously, the scar...